Winters – CC literature update 12-14-17

Summary by Lia Losonczy, MD, MPH

Sepsis:

“Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28101605

  • Had over 90 recommendations

Pearls:

  • SSC acknowledges but does not endorse Sepsis 3 definitions; more research/data needed
  • CMS has its own definition
  • Eliminated term “severe sepsis” –> sepsis = evidence of infection + end-organ dysfunction
  • Septic shock= above + lack of response to fluids + elevated lactate

Fluids

  • EGDT no longer recommended (based on ProMISe, ProCESS, ARISE trial)
    • No longer recommended because there’s no benefit it over “usual care”
  •  Fluids: 30mL/kg crystalloid in first 3 hours for sepsis-induced hypotension
    • ProMISe, ProCESS, ARISE had less fluid given after enrollment than in Rivers’ study
    • However, many of these patients (including those with ESRD & CHF) already had fluid from EMS and ED prior to enrollment, so actual fluid total was almost 30mL/kg; Rivers’ study did not report pre-enrollment IVF quantity, so those patients likely got >30 mL/kg
    • Additional IVF after reassessment using dynamic methods rather than static measures

Antibiotics

  • IV antibiotics ASAP within 1 hour of recognition of sepsis and septic shock;
  • Dose based on pharmacokinetic dynamic principles:1 gm of vanc not necessarily appropriate for all patients, need weight based 
  • Combination abx therapy for septic shock; although not necessarily born out in literature, this is the recommendation

Vasoactives
      –    First-line:  norepinephrine

  • Second-line:  either epinephrine or vasopressin
  • Arterial line as soon as practical

Steroids

  • Suggest for pts with persistent shock despite fluids + pressors
  • Recommended hydrocortisone at 200 mg/day

Mechanical Ventilation

  • Suggest low-tidal volume ventilation in adults even WITHOUT ARDS
  • Elevate HOB to 30-35 degrees

Sepsis Resuscitation in 2017:

-Early identification

-Appropriate abx

-Fluid resuscitation and reassessment

-Lactate

Early identification:

  • Sepsis 3 definition: SOFA in the ICU, but qSOFA outside the ICU
  • Clinical decision-making tools and injury severity tools are different concepts, despite being used interchangeably: BE CAREFUL about confusing them!
  • qSOFA better than SIRS at predicting mortality

“Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment and Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome Criteria as Predictors of Critical Care Intervention Among Patients With Suspected Infection.”

  • Looked at qSOFA as predictor of critical care intervention (CCI) among patients with suspected infection:
    • 24,164 pts in retrospective cohort
    • 6,693 admitted to ICU
    • >66% got CCI
    • Of ppl with >2 on qSOFA, 48% had CCI, and 13.4% died.
    • The majority had score <2, but still 13.5% had a CCI, and >3% died
    • In fact 23% of pts with qSOFA of 1 still needed CCI

***Caution when using qSOFA as clinical decision-making tool:  predicts mortality, but not sensitive for all critical illness (sensitivity 13%)***

Antibiotics:

“Increased Time to Initial Antimicrobial Administration Is Associated With Progression to Septic Shock in Severe Sepsis Patients.”https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28169944

  • Looked at association of abx timing with progression to septic shock from sepsis
  • Retrospective review, single academic center
  • Excluded those already in shock
  • 3,929 patients
  • 25% progressed to septic shock
  • Each hour delay between ED triage and abx administration: Risk of progression to septic shock by 8% per hour! Important to get abx early

“Delayed Second Dose Antibiotics for Patients Admitted From the Emergency Department With Sepsis: Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes.”https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28328652

  • Descriptive analysis of current prevalence of delay to second dose of antibiotics
    • Retrospective cohort study, single urban ED
    • Adult pts with sepsis or septic shock
    • Defined as major delay: greater than 25% of the recommended interval (based on Sanford’s Guide)
    • Primary outcome: how often major delay, Secondary Outcome: association with mortality
    • Results: 33% had major delay in 2nd dose, median delay was closer to 79% of the time
    • Boarding pts identified as independent risk factor for delay to 2nd dose
    • Associated with 1.6x mortality and 2.4x odds of mechanical ventilation

“Antipyretic Therapy in Critically Ill Septic Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28221185

  • Systematic review: included RCTs and observational trials
  • Looked at effect of antipyretic therapy on mortality
  • Primary outcome: 28-day mortality
  • Found 16 trials: 8 RCTs, 8 observational
  • Results: No difference in mortality
  • HR and minute ventilation also not different between two groups: maybe tachycardia and tachypnea not due to fever after all?

Sepsis Summary:

  • EDGT no longer recommended
  • 30mL/kg crystalloid in the first 3 hours
  • Dynamic markers for fluid responsiveness
  • IV abx ASAP- within 1 hour
  • Target ≥65 for MAP
  • Use norepinephrine as first line pressor, followed by vasopressin or epinephrine
  • LTV ventilation even in absence of ARDS
  • Be careful using qSOFA to rule out sepsis- not meant for that!
  • 1 in 3 pts had major delay to the 2nd dose of abx, which impacts mortality
  • Antipyretic therapy does not change mortality

Cardiac Arrest Care

-Team Leadership

-High Quality CPR

“Part 5: Adult Basic Life Support and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26472993

      –     As team leader you need to ensure high quality CPR

  • Rate 100-120
  • Chest compression fraction >60%
  • Depth 5-6 cm
  • Allow full chest recoil
  • Avoid leaning
  • Minimize interruptions: Airway (speaking about cardiac arrest especially), pulse checks, ETCO2 (USE it!!), ultrasound

“Ultrasound use during cardiopulmonary resuscitation is associated with delays in chest compressions.” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=ultrasound+use+during+chest+compression+huis

  • Prospective cohort at UMMC ED, single academic ED
  • Does POCUS affect CPR pause duration?
  • Videotaped medical codes in resus rooms
  • Primary Outcome: pulse check duration
  • 23 pts with 123 pulse checks
  • No POCUS pauses 13s  versus with POCUS 21s
  • Only 1 pt survived to hospital discharge, so can’t say anything about mortality
  • Similar study out of Highland Hospital also found No POCUS pauses 11s vs with POCUS 17s
  • “Point-of-care ultrasound use in patients with cardiac arrest is associated prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation pauses: A prospective cohort study.”https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29175356

Take Home: POCUS lengthens duration of pulse checks, may increase interruptions in CPR **Pay Attention to Time with POCUS***

Post-Arrest Care

A comprehensive approach

  • Optimise oxygenation and ventilation
  • Optimize hemodynamics
  • Targeted temperature management
  • Emergent PCI

“Favorable Neurocognitive Outcome with Low Tidal Volume Ventilation after Cardiac Arrest.” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28267376

– Retrospective cohort, non-traumatic OHCA, vented at least 2 days

– Time weighted TV over 48 hours

– Primary outcome: Neurologic outcome

– 256 pts

– 38% > 8ml/kg

– Low tidal volume (LTV) ventilation was associated with favorable neurologic outcome (OR 1.61)

– Also more days without shock and ventilator-free days

“Targeted Temperature Management for 48 vs 24 Hours and Neurologic Outcome After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Randomized Clinical Trial.”https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28742911

– Multicenter RCT

– 10 ICUs in 6 European countries

– Adult pts with OHCA due to presumed cardiac etiology

– GCS <8

– Cooled to 33c x48 hrs vs 33c x24 hours (control)

– Primary outcome: Neuro outcome at 6 months: No difference

– Secondary outcomes: No difference in 6 month mortality, increased “adverse events” in 48-hour group (esp hypotension), also cooling longer –> longer vent and longer ICU stay

– Limitations: 60% of those screened were excluded, sample size based on 15% absolute difference (more pts may have shown a difference, not powered to detect smaller difference)

Take home: Did not help neuro outcomes to cool longer, but increased time in ICU

Post Cardiac Arrest Summary:

– POCUS: pay attention to time using ultrasound during CPR pauses!

– Use LTV ventilation in post-arrest

– No difference in neuro outcomes between cooling 24 v 48 hrs

Mechanical Ventilation

“Analgosedation Practices and the Impact of Sedation Depth on Clinical Outcomes Among Patients Requiring Mechanical Ventilation in the ED: A Cohort Study.” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28645462

– Secondary analysis of prospective cohort, single tertiary academic center, assess relationship btwn ED sedation depth and worse outcomes

– Defined deep sedation as RASS -3 to -5

– Primary Outcome: hospital mortality

– 14.3% no analgesic, 15.2% no sedation

– Deep sedation occured in 64%, and was associated with increased mortality (OR 0.77 mortality with lighter sedation)

“Lung-Protective Ventilation Initiated in the Emergency Department (LOV-ED): A Quasi-Experimental, Before-After Trial.” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28259481

-Pre/Post Intervention 2009-20014 (retrospective) after educational campaign and getting tape measure for accurate height in ED and then doing Lung-Protective Ventilation: 6mL/kg TV, limit plateau <30, elevated HOB to 30-45 degrees

-LPV increased in ED over 48.4%

-LPV increased by ICU 30.7%

-Mortality 14.5% absolute risk reduction

Leave a Comment

Scroll to Top
Verified by ExactMetrics